Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:07
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Beyoncé Briefly Dangles Over Houston Stadium Crowd As Flying Prop Car Malfunctions - Deadline
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sharpest View of the Sun Reveals Magnetic Stripes the Size of Manhattan - Gizmodo
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 Launch Week Restocks - Here's What We Know So Far - GameSpot
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
13-inch Microsoft Surface Laptop review: A slightly worse version of a year-old PC - Ars Technica
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What do you wear when you are alone at home?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.